Kapitelklicken springt direkt hin
Shownotes
Ethereum may be paying too much to secure itself, and the consequences could extend far beyond a little extra ETH issuance. Jerome de Tychey, co-author of EIP-8363, and Sam Jernigan join David Hoffman to make the case for stake targeting, a proposal designed to stop Ethereum’s staking ratio from climbing indefinitely. They debate what happens if more than half of ETH becomes staked, whether today’s issuance threatens credible neutrality, why staking may be crowding out DeFi, what lower rewards could mean for ETH’s monetary premium, and whether solo stakers and institutional holders ultimately win or lose from the change. Subscribe for more conversations on Ethereum’s monetary policy and future.
---
📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24
bankless.cc/spotify-premium
---
BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS:
🔓 NEAR | TRADE CONFIDENTIALLY, GET 20% BACK
bankless.cc/near-pod
🔑 BITKEY | GET 10% OFF USE CODE: BANKLESS | #bitkeypartner
bankless.cc/bitkey
📊 BITGET | TOKENIZED STOCKS 2.0
bankless.cc/bitget-stocks
🎯 THE DEFI REPORT | ONCHAIN INSIGHTS
thedefireport.io/bankless
👑 BANKLESS CONTENT MCP
bankless.com/premium
---
TIMESTAMPS
Why Ethereum Needs Stake Targeting
What Actually Breaks With More ETH Staked?
The 50% Social Backstop
Ethereum’s Protocol vs. Its DeFi Economy
Is Staking Crowding Out DeFi?
Dilution, Subsidies, and ETH Price
Would Lower Rewards Hurt or Help DeFi?
What About Tom Lee and Institutional ETH Holders?
Does This Hurt Solo Stakers?
Why EIP-8363 Is So Contentious
The Final Case for Changing Issuance
---
RESOURCES
Jerome de Tychey
x.com/jdetychey
Sam Jernigan
x.com/macrosam
---
Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here:
bankless.com/disclosures
