Anmelden

Business Of Biotech· Folge 327

AI, China, And Biotech Investing With SR One's Simeon George, M.D.

Montag, 12. Oktober 2026 · 49 min

MP3

Shownotes

We love to hear from our listeners. Send us a message. (buzzsprout.com/1011661/fan_mail/new)
On this week's episode of the Business of Biotech, Simeon George, M.D., Cofounder and CEO at SR One Capital Management, returns to the show to talk about how SR One evaluates biotech investment targets, and the good and bad signs that emerge during diligence. Simeon also discusses a new report published by SR One (srone.framer.website) on how AI and China are changing the strategy and playbook for new drug creation.
Access this and hundreds of episodes of the Business of Biotech videocast under the Business of Biotech (lifescienceleader.com/solution/the-business-of…) tab at lifescienceleader.com.
Subscribe to our monthly Business of Biotech newsletter (www9.lifescienceleader.com/business-of-biotech…).

Get in touch with guest and topic suggestions: ben.comer@lifescienceleader.com

Find Ben Comer on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/bencomer

Transkriptvom Podcast bereitgestellt · Zeitmarken springen hin

Ben Comer Welcome back to the Business of Biotech. I'm your host, Ben Comer, Chief Editor at Life Science Leader, and today I'm speaking with Dr. Simeon George, CEO and co-founder at SR One Capital Management, a biotech VC firm spun out of GSK in 2020. We'll hear from Simeon about the firm's approach and the kinds of biotech companies SR One targets for investment.

Ben Comer And we'll discuss two important issues impacting the biotech startup and drug development landscape, AI and China, and what both could mean for the future of medicine. Simeon, uh, thank you so much for joining me. I appreciate it.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, Ben, thanks for this opportunity. And uh hopefully thanks uh for what's going to be an interesting conversation for you and your listeners.

Ben Comer Yeah, well, I'm glad to have you on the show. And uh as we do here on the business of biotech, I wanted to start off uh with a little bit of your background, Simeon. And I'm curious, uh, I believe you did uh a dual MBA MD program at um at UPenn. Is that correct?

Simeon George, M.D. That's correct. Yes, that's right.

Ben Comer I'm wondering how that uh that shaped your professional trajectory. I mean, did you plan to get into you know venture capital and investing when you started out in that in that dual program? Or did your focus change, you know, as you went through it?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, no, I mean, honestly, I didn't have a clear sense of what I wanted to do. I was just always deeply interested in science, medicine. Like I grew up in a physician household. Both my wife and I went to undergrad and then medical school together at Penn. And so there's a personal connection there.

Simeon George, M.D. And then the MBA was really a way to kind of express my growing interest in, frankly, the emerging field of biotechnology and startups and creating something from nothing, uh, and working with really incredible founders and entrepreneurs. And that, you know, that uh was expressed while it while I was in school.

Simeon George, M.D. So I had time during my six years to spend time working in a startup. I work in consulting, I worked in banking, I worked in venture. So really the dual degree was a way to really explore and and figure out sort of which director of travel I wanted to go in. And then the clinical training, of course, underpins everything that I do uh in my life.

Simeon George, M.D. And it's it's you know my reason to be, if you will. It's like it's what gets me out of bed. It's coming up with new uh products that are gonna have hopefully massive patient impact.

Ben Comer Yeah, and banking and consulting, I think that was at uh Goldman and Bain, respectively. Were there uh were there things that you learned uh from those experiences that you think maybe you know that you've brought forward or that have helped you as an investor, Simeon?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, I mean, again, I didn't spend a ton of time there. So again, it it gave me some of the basic frameworks to break down problems, to communicate, to be able to assess uh and come up with ways to test hypotheses and again work with incredibly smart people, thinking about the lens of capital allocation and raising capital.

Simeon George, M.D. And and again, on the on the consulting side, thinking about I worked on one really interesting project where we're essentially working with the private equity arm, we were looking at one of the large pharma players and essentially doing a recap or a leverage buyout of that company. Um, and so I got to look at sort of the pipeline and assess, as you think about the synergies, where would you double down, where would you deprioritize, got to spend time with the leadership team of that pharma company as we were evaluating that.

Simeon George, M.D. And then the global financial crisis basically took place and ultimately made that deal, I think, something that was never likely to happen.

Ben Comer Wow. Okay. Yeah. Were you involved in some of the, you know, like the the Zoom meetings, uh, you know, where there was a number of transactions, obviously, that took place during COVID. And uh I've heard from other executives about just the the difference of the experience between going around and and you know doing your due diligence in person versus uh versus doing it on Zoom, but you you navigated that.

Ben Comer I guess you did some of that, right?

Simeon George, M.D. For sure. I mean, nothing beats in-person, right? Usually for each of the two. Um but yeah, for sure. Whichever way you could, I guess, get to the right stakeholders, have those conversations. You know, I think certainly what I learned in in both you know client-facing roles such as consulting or banking, you need to turn up with your best uh thoughts prepared and a way to communicate and sort of take all of the diligence, synthesize it, uh, and try and win hearts and minds.

Simeon George, M.D. And so, again, like I have to do that day in, day out now. So there's a lot that I take from those experiences. And the last point, which again, I think is important to note, is like the power of networks. You know, so some of the folks that I work closely with right now are friends and colleagues that I establish relationships with during my time at Bain or in the Penn MD MBA network.

Simeon George, M.D. Again, it's it's a network that now stands, I think, 50 plus years. And so there are stakeholders involved at every part of the ecosystem of healthcare. And and I and I feel fortunate to be able to access those people with a level of trust and you know, engagement that comes from having that affiliation.

Ben Comer Right. Um SR One spun out, it was the venture arm, I believe, of GSK, uh spun out in 2020. Um, can you tell me a little about maybe the reasons uh for that? Of course, you know, there are a number of big pharma companies that have venture arms. Uh, and so I'm just curious about why, you know, GSK's approach to spinning, spinning SR One out into an independent entity.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah. I mean, probably helpful for the audience just to understand uh uh the initial architecture of SR One. I mean, it was set up as uh one of the oldest corporate venture arms back in the 1980s, and it was set up when biotech was just emerging as a new field, and it was set up with a true financial remit.

Simeon George, M.D. So there was never a intention around business development or a funnel into RD or business development. And the name itself is a giveaway, right? The name was not GSK Ventures. It was set up as an independent entity that could source independently, uh, select independently, manage independently. And so when I joined, again, like now close to 20 years ago, that remit essentially meant that I was working at a venture capital firm that had an LP of one, and that LP was GSK.

Simeon George, M.D. Um, and over the 35-year history of GS of SR One as part of GSK, the fund did incredibly well from a financial return standpoint. And it it frankly got to the point as sometimes happens within organizations where there was clearly a focus and intent for myself and my colleagues to frankly control our destiny, to take the business to the next level.

Simeon George, M.D. We had been very successful and we were ready to back ourselves. And for GSK, it was a purely, I'd say, a capital allocation decision. There were new CEO, new RD heads that were looking at their business and a financial focused organization that wasn't helping to build a pipeline didn't necessarily make the most sense on a go-forward basis uh in that same structure.

Simeon George, M.D. But there was strong support for SR One to continue to flourish and do this as an independent organization. And so GSK has been and continues to be one of our strongest stakeholders, LPs that has supported us over the last six years across multiple funds now. So we're incredibly grateful for uh that support.

Simeon George, M.D. But at the same time, we've been able to broaden out our LP base and create, I think, a really compelling platform that allows us to do what we did really well at GSK, but now do it, take it to the next level in terms of the team we've built, the capabilities we've added, obviously the now distributed set of LPs that we have as part of our LP base.

Ben Comer Uh we mentioned COVID, and uh I'm just looking, you know, at the date SR One spinning out in 2020. Was that uh you know a difficult first couple of years once you became independent? Or you know, you you I guess had your fund at that point. It wasn't you didn't maybe run into some of the same uh problems post-COVID that you know a lot of biotechs did, the kind of biotech winner that we're you know only now just recovering from.

Ben Comer Um but I was just curious, you know, if it was difficult in those early days, you know, with the the market trending down uh after COVID and you guys, you know, just becoming independent or no.

Simeon George, M.D. No, I mean it was obviously it was just a weird time, right? Um everything that was happening there. So that year, I mean, to give you some sense, you know, Ben, we got GSK's board to approve the spin out in mid-March of 2020, right when the world went into lockdown. And so, you know, I spent six months basically fundraising on Zoom, you know, traveling wherever I could travel to be able to talk to LPs.

Simeon George, M.D. So it was a strange dynamic around which we were able to spin out and raise capital. But it was also equally, you know, we were fortunate that that was, as you know, a year and a couple of years where there was so much interest in what was happening in biotech, not least the vaccines that came um, you know, from Moderna, from Beyond Tech, et cetera.

Simeon George, M.D. And so we took advantage of that window to be able to create that first fund. That first one was a 500 million vehicle. You know, we now manage over 2 billion across multiple funds, but we had that foundation again, GSK support, plus a handful of really compelling LP or LPs that we were able to compel to join us on that journey.

Simeon George, M.D. Um, and so we had the war chest, if you will, to be able to deploy capital, provide revert reserves for our next set of companies that we invested in. And, you know, relatively quickly on the back of that, we raised our second venture fund. Uh, and so to your point, like there was, you know, we've lived through uh biotech winter, I guess it's been called, and we had capital that we could then preciously deploy uh and back ourselves in a way that, you know, has allowed us to continue to have quite a bit of success over the last few years.

Ben Comer Is there a specific niche or a segment of the life sciences industry that SR One um maybe focused on uh initially post-spin out? I mean, is it is that investment focus uh stayed the same? Has it evolved over the last six years? Um how how would you talk about that? What you're what you're kind of focused on?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah. I mean, listen, first principles, I mean, we always have to kind of continue to evolve and adapt to what's happening in our ecosystem, right? And I know we're gonna get into China and AI, but you know, the world is a very dynamic place, right? So the way that we're investing, the way that we spend time strategizing, first and foremost, we believe in sort of a proactive approach to how we think about generating ideas, product theses, et cetera.

Simeon George, M.D. We leverage the strong pharma connectivity. Of course, we've come out of one pharma, and now we have, I would say, really strong connectivity with senior stakeholders across the board. Like right before this meeting, I was on a Zoom with two uh heads of RD of Big Pharma, right? Which is just like an amazing access point to be able to talk to individuals uh and triangulate with them on where the unmet need is, what products would make the most sense, et cetera.

Simeon George, M.D. And so we have, as I said earlier, like we've basically taken what we were very good at within GSK, and we've taken it to the next level now in terms of how we've built that level of network access and our ability to invest as broadened. You know, when while we were part of GSK, we focused, you know, mostly on early stage seed company formation series A, series B.

Simeon George, M.D. Over the last few years, we've built a capability, we've added individuals on my team, including Jake Nunn, who come from the late stage private and public investment arena. And so we think of ourselves as end-to-end investors. And really what that means is we have a view of the world, a prepared mind.

Simeon George, M.D. We think about products and what the opportunity set is, and then we look at where is the right entry point from company creation all the way through late stage, private or public, to be able to deploy capital and generate a return for our investors.

Ben Comer Okay, so all the way through late stage into commercial, into commercial companies as well?

Simeon George, M.D. Um, I don't know if we've invested in a at the time of investment a commercial company, but we've certainly invested in companies that have essentially a data set that they're gonna go to the FDA with, um, or a data set that is we're funding to that phase three. So probably Viradermix is the best recent example where we led the series C.

Simeon George, M.D. This is a company developing uh an oral monoxidal, a high dose monoxidal for hair loss. We funded the company. They had about a hundred subjects worth of data, and we funded the company through phase three uh readouts. And, you know, um, the company has had an incredible year this year. Phase threes have hit.

Simeon George, M.D. The phase two and women has also shown ability to regrow hair, safe profile. And the company, you know, has uh I think it's been the best performing IPO uh of any IPO that's happened this year. And so that is an example of late stage, some level of de-risking. Obviously, there's still additional development, regulatory um uncertainty, but that's what we're underwriting towards.

Ben Comer Can you tell me a little bit more, I guess, about the specifics? And you you've you've mentioned that you know you have a broad lens uh for you know the biotech landscape, but are there specific things you look at just in terms of, I don't know, um, company location, drug modality? You just uh talked about clinical stage, but therapeutic area.

Ben Comer Um how do you think about you know prioritizing um companies and and the criteria that that you're using?

Simeon George, M.D. Um it's it's loose with but fixed, maybe is what I would say. So I run my uh investment team, you know, we have people that really I give them the ability to go out and express themselves in terms of what gets the most excited, you know, have a prepared mind, where are the areas that they think about from neuroscience to cancer to autoimmune.

Simeon George, M.D. Um, and we really sit around the same table, whether it's looking at an early stage company build all the way through late stage, and we talk about those ideas. Um, but we're not pragmatic or dogmatic when it comes to how we think about entry points, modalities. Again, we're looking for compelling founders, entrepreneurs that we believe truly are world-class in terms of the capabilities needed at that point in time to continue to advance the program.

Simeon George, M.D. We are product focused, like we'll invest in platforms, like CRISPR is probably the best example of that. But the platform has to be focused around a medicine in a particular unmet need that we believe is going to create significant value if we can hit that target product profile. Um, but beyond that, you know, there's many degrees and ways that we express ourselves.

Simeon George, M.D. Um, and again, it can be what I described with viradermix, which, you know, you could say is low science, but I would argue is, you know, technically very challenging to be able to create that profile of molecule. And again, the unmet need is significant, uh, as we all know. Um all the way through something like Arcellix, where I'm a cow, I'm a co-founder of this company.

Simeon George, M.D. You know, we started it from a blank sheet of paper. And again, like there you've got potentially a curative treatment for multiple myeloma right now, right? And when you've seen the data that's been generated and the impact it's having in patients that have failed multiple lines of treatment, and ultimately you've seen what Gilead has paid for half of the product rights this year.

Simeon George, M.D. You can see the transformative potential of that molecule. So we can go from cutting-edge advanced modalities, autologous CAR T all the way through an oral monoxidyl for hair loss. Like that is probably as end-to-end as you can imagine.

Ben Comer Yeah, I wanted to ask you about our CELIX. Uh Rami Elgendor has been a guest on the business of biotech. Obviously, you know, the acquisition by Gilead uh in April for $7.8 billion. Um I but I wanted to ask, I guess, did what role maybe SR One played in in that transaction, if any, and and if you had any um, you know, any insight into how that that deal came together.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah. I mean, again, first principle is like we're uh co-founder of the company, right? So there's a a role here from start of this journey that I think is is uh is one of the most impactful things that I've ever done in my career. Um my colleague um Joe Carroll served on the board after I transitioned off that board.

Simeon George, M.D. Rami, close friend of ours, we recruited into the company to take on when we had an early data set that looked interesting, but at a time when, you know, frankly, the uh the bloom had come off the rose when it comes to autologous treatments. And so, you know, we we were able to really um back ourselves and continue to invest in the company through those private rounds into the IPO.

Simeon George, M.D. When frankly, there weren't that many interested parties looking to invest in that sort of a company. Um the introduction to Gilead, Kite came through our network, through you know, the connectivity that I have with that organization. So that led to the partnership, of course, that we first did. And then ultimately, you know, again, without saying too much, like the process that we ran earlier this year with with Kite Gilead.

Simeon George, M.D. Obviously, there were relationships there uh with the team at Gilead that helped, again, I'd say, facilitate the dialogue and ultimately get to hopefully what is the you know a great outcome for for Gilead for our CELICs and most importantly for the patients with multiple myeloma who hopefully will have access to this medicine in the coming months.

Ben Comer So you mentioned uh, you know, it's important to you you may invest in a platform, but you you want to see, you know, uh, I I think what you were saying is a kind of a candidate with a dedicated indication maybe before SR One would come in. Is that is was that the case, you know, like with our Celex when the when SR One came in or when you were you know co-founding the company, was that did you already have the asset and or you know, well are you is is SR One willing to invest in something that is essentially at the idea stage?

Ben Comer I'm just trying to understand, you know, where what what level a company might have to reach before you know they might look be on you know SR One's uh spreadsheet.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, I mean again, it's uh it is situational. In the case of our cell X, again, it goes back to the the pen connection, right? So, you know, I um I went to to medical school during the time that uh you know Carl June was obviously doing his pioneering work in the autologous car T field and followed it pretty closely after graduating.

Simeon George, M.D. And you know, we all saw that data in CD19, and it was unlike any other data set we have seen uh for these hematologic malignancies. And so fascinated by that area um and you know, strong close personal connection with Ali Bebahani, also a classmate of mine from Pen Madden from Wharton, who was at NEA.

Simeon George, M.D. And so together the two of us started this company with David Hilbert, who was the scientific founder. So at the time that we started it, we basically had the D-domain, the technology, essentially the underlying technology. And our thesis was we can use that technology to be able to develop, you know, yeah, a unique way of engineering these cells that could allow us to potentially, from a safety or efficacy uh standpoint, essentially create a molecule that could be best in class for these targets that we were looking at.

Simeon George, M.D. And for BCMA, again, um, it was a way, again, to go after a slightly different target as well as disease area relative to CD19, which was obviously the the leader uh in the CAR T field. Uh and so that was, again, like the initial underpinning was a platform technology, but the use cases where we were thinking about from day one, we had a pretty clear sense of where we were going.

Simeon George, M.D. And then, you know, as you should do, you follow the science and the data, and it just got more and more compelling around that first program.

Ben Comer Yeah. Uh I want to get to AI in China in in just a minute, but uh before I do, I have maybe two more things I just want to ask about uh SR One's model. Um, and one is on on founders, you know, and and company leaders. Are there any, I guess, characteristics that you look for or that are a kind of must-have for uh a founder or company leader that is working at a place that SR One might be interested in investing in?

Simeon George, M.D. I mean, again, so this will be situational, right? Depending on stage of company, sort of what the needs are of the business. Um, I mean, probably the one that's top of mind right now for me is is Dr. Jen Lee, who's the CEO and founder of 8RX, which is a company that just listed on Nasdaq a couple of weeks ago.

Simeon George, M.D. And, you know, we've been an investor in this company for the last five years. And I mean, she's like within within the first meeting that I had with her, you could just tell, like, there's probably no one on this planet that understand understands RNA medicine, specifically SIRNA in the way that she does.

Simeon George, M.D. And what she had demonstrated across large pharma as well as Arrowhead was really second to none in terms of how she had built a pipeline from that understanding. Um, and so again, like I in my, I guess when I've described her, I've described her as an end of one founder. Yeah. There's a limit of just like world class, like there is no one you'd rather bet on to develop a technology and turn it into a product than someone like that.

Simeon George, M.D. Um and from there, obviously, as the company evolves and matures, you need to think about how that individual can recruit talent around them that can make up for areas that are not in their expertise, that are complementary to what they might be able to do. Rami's a great example, right? I mean, someone who is, you've interviewed him, so you understand just the power of his leadership, his communication style, his ability to build a team that is both diverse but just incredibly capable across different dimensions, uh, and to bet on talent, right?

Simeon George, M.D. Maybe talent that necessarily hasn't been proven in those roles before. Um, and then ultimately to be able to execute. So, what both Jen and someone like Rami share is an ability to do things that just seem impossible, like just like would not be possible in most individuals' legal. Leadership capacity, right?

Simeon George, M.D. So this is truly an outlier of business. And I think probably we kid ourselves if we think that every company and every founder and entrepreneur is going to succeed. Like these are one in a thousand sort of individuals, and that's what we look for. And it'll be situationally, you know, you have to know the the jockey for the course for the horse that you're on.

Simeon George, M.D. But it there has to be an element of like world-class leadership that is demonstrated, and we need to feel that uh as we're making the investment.

Ben Comer What about on the other side? Um, so you're you you you see a company, uh you maybe you don't have a close relationship or don't know the founder or CEO personally, you're doing your due diligence. You know, what are what are some red flags that will, you know, move you along, you know, to the next potential target?

Simeon George, M.D. Um, I mean, listen, there's you know, oftentimes they're just um most of the times we say no, right? As you know, like we see hundreds of opportunities that we're gonna invest in a handful. And so it's not necessarily the case that there are gonna be red flags. I mean, obviously red flags are going to be uh a there isn't the level of transparency or trust that you're building with the founder or entrepreneur.

Simeon George, M.D. So how they're communicating with you, how they're answering your questions or avoiding giving you straight answers. Um we all have blind spots, but are they aware of their blind spots? How are they thinking about um mitigating those blind spots, if you will? I think those are things that you know can cause us to take take pause.

Simeon George, M.D. Um and uh again, like we're I guess we're just compelled by really uh interesting products that we believe fill a you know important unmet need, right? So differentiation, how you think about that molecule sitting alongside what the current treatments are, what's coming in the pipeline of large and mid-cap and smaller companies.

Simeon George, M.D. So that understanding is really important to us. Um yeah, I'd say those are the things that we focus on.

Ben Comer Let's talk about AI in China. Um SR One uh has uh his publisher report, the New Economics of Drug Development, uh focused on these two issues uh as the kind of key structural forces reshaping how drugs get made. Um on AI, the report talks about um three different areas where it's it's making a substantial impact: target selection, molecule design, and clinical testing.

Ben Comer Of those three areas, um, which do you think is currently underutilizing AI technology? Or in other words, where could the biggest leaps occur in in the short term?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, I mean, listen, we have a very specific view and thesis here, which is to focus on early development and how do you use AI to really improve the ability to positively predict what is going to happen in late stage development by the decisions you're making in early development? And how do you essentially train and learn from early development by the reps that you're doing with the molecules as they're going through that system?

Simeon George, M.D. And so we believe that is where there's the most dynamic ability to impact which patients, how to enrich, which markers. Uh, again, how do you essentially model what's going to happen into late stage development? Because, as you know, those studies are generally speaking, smaller number of patients, shorter duration, less cost.

Simeon George, M.D. And so you get the most bang for your buck before you go into late stage, where again, the time and the number of patients and the cost obviously goes up dramatically.

Ben Comer The report references um companies that have made uh deep investments in AI-enabled uh data platforms and knowledge graphs built with great technical skill, but that ultimately struggle to turn these tools into products that that patients need and buyers will pay for. How should companies think about building a hybrid approach, I guess, that that optimizes both the artificial and natural uh human intelligence?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, I mean, so you know, again, I I referenced this call that I was just on with these two heads of RD. And we were uh we were waxing lyrical about this point. And the reality is, I think you have to start from first principles. There's, you know, hopefully it's pretty clear in this call. We focus on the product, we focus on patient impact.

Simeon George, M.D. So you have to start with what is the problem you're solving? And then what are all the ways you're gonna leverage China, AI, whatever it is, these are tools to ultimately get to what matters, right? And so when when you have that sort of truth-seeking true north approach, what it means is you should probably start with a team that deeply understands drug development.

Simeon George, M.D. Again, like that's where we believe most value is captured. And then alongside that team that is again development focused, product-oriented, you then need to build the capabilities, the artificial or technological capabilities that can allow those stakeholders to ultimately do their jobs to the best of their abilities, leveraging those capabilities, right?

Simeon George, M.D. So there needs to be synergy, but the uh the piece that is critical is getting that development expertise and insights and product orientation into organizations sooner rather than later. And where we have, you know, I'd say been challenged, or maybe we've spent too much time and cost associated with it, is where we focus too much on the platform, the technology, and then go, you know, before we went after the problems that ultimately are going to drive patient impact and value.

Ben Comer Yeah. It so it the person who is that like a chief technology officer typically, uh, and I guess it might be different in a small biotech versus big pharma, but what is the, you know, who is in that role? And maybe it varies, but who is in that role typically that's actually not only selecting which tech which kind of AI programs, software, algorithms to you agents to use, uh, but then also balancing, you know, the the investment and use of that AI with the human workforce and and implementing it.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah. And again, like let's let's acknowledge, Ben, these are rapidly evolving.

Ben Comer Yeah, it's like the answer might change tomorrow, right?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, right. So again, where we sit today, what are we, October 6th, 2026? Again, our belief is you need to start with someone that really understands development. So again, like a CMO, someone with that medical orientation, okay, that is surrounding themselves with, you can call it a CTO, you know, like people that are truly going to be probably AI native in a way that can allow you to decide what does what needs to be built in-house that is truly proprietary to the company.

Simeon George, M.D. And what are the capabilities you can work with sort of off the shelf, um, whether it's the model, whether it's, you know, the partners that are out there that are obviously making inroads into our business. And it's going to be a little bit of trial and error, but that's our thesis. You start with the core development capability and then you add technology around it.

Simeon George, M.D. Um, and there should be enough crosstalk that is allowing both sides to benefit from the language that the other is speaking.

Ben Comer Okay. All right. And the the into the just uh the core development capability. Is that I I assume that's probably different for a big pharma company that has, you know, a vast pipeline and numerous um clinical development programs versus a biotech that maybe has a single, you know, lead program or maybe, you know, one or two or three candidates.

Ben Comer Um and I don't know if it's even possible to describe it this way, but is there kind of like a table stakes entry-level capability with AI for uh for that that latter example for the startup biotech? Or is it gonna vary depending on the drug modality or the therapeutic area or what have you? Yeah.

Simeon George, M.D. I mean, it's a great question. I mean, it is in my mind, it's like turning the traditional RD model on its head. And what I mean by that is um right now, for all intents and purposes, we're sort of living in an analog world when it comes to what the TPP looks like that either a large company or a small company is working on.

Simeon George, M.D. Like we have the TPP, each group, each each company has different functions that's working on basic research, preclinical, IND enabling, PKPD, CMC. They're all sort of working towards that static TPP. What we're, I think, envisioning is a world where you basically have a dynamic life target product profile that is taking inputs across the spectrum.

Simeon George, M.D. It doesn't just sit in the silos and it is reacting to data that is both internally generated on the molecule itself and the properties of that molecule. So it's a it's adapting and adjusting as you move in real time, but it's also taking into account what is happening from a commercial or a competitive standpoint, because each of these fields, diseases, is living in an environment where new data sets are dropping almost every day.

Simeon George, M.D. And then you take into account what's happening in China. So if you're working on an analog TPP that was written even three months ago for, you know, pick your favorite disease, I guarantee you something has changed over the last three months. And if you're not constantly updating, in our view, what the threshold is for what success looks like, you're probably not working in the optimum way.

Simeon George, M.D. And this is where AI, we believe, has to be able to help connect the dots across these different stakeholders. And it is absolutely going to be easier to do this in a startup smaller company setting than it is in an organization of 10 or 15,000 RD uh uh employees in large pharma.

Ben Comer Right. Right. Well, yeah, speaking of uh new data showing up, you know, every every three months, um, the the speed and and cost of new drug development in China is unmatched uh in the Western world. The report mentions private conversations that SR One has had with pharma executives who are discouraged by the fact that Chinese companies can outrun their own in-house RD uh shops, uh at least in some areas.

Ben Comer Uh the report also mentions the fact that the old playbook of going it alone in China, sourcing early assets there and running them through developmental or development clinical trials in the West is becoming an increasingly tough road uh for investors in biotechs. Um well, first let me ask why why is that the case?

Ben Comer Uh that this old playbook is is becoming more difficult? And then what does the new playbook look like?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, I mean, again, like this is a you know a rapidly evolving um environment that we that we live in, right? And so again, like the answers I'm giving you now reflect where we are today based on geopolitical as well as just the overall framework for how we think about things. Again, first you know, uh first principles.

Simeon George, M.D. There is no doubt that you know China is a significant force in the overall global drug discovery and development infrastructure right now. And it's only probably going to continue to increase and improve in terms of how much they're they're looking to do. And again, you know, we'll probably get into sort of their what they've said about five-year planning, what the ambitions are.

Simeon George, M.D. I think what it means, I mean, again, I I start going back to the first question you asked me. Like if uh if if I'm a patient or if I'm a physician, I don't care about where the drug was sourced, how it was developed. I care about does this work for me, does it help me treat, cure, manage my disease, right?

Simeon George, M.D. So I think for patients, this is an incredible opportunity right now, hopefully to see medicines that are gonna get to them hopefully faster, sooner, and ideally costing less, right? And there is a cost piece to this puzzle that we have to think about through the different stakeholders that we have in mind, right?

Simeon George, M.D. So um, maybe getting to your question first. The reality is like everyone has noticed what is happening in China. Pharma companies are doing deals, investors such as myself are going and picking off assets. The Chinese pharma and biotech companies are recognizing the value that's being ascribed. And so it only makes sense that that playbook has to be updated, right?

Simeon George, M.D. If there was an arbitrage or spread between sort of the ability to get a deal done versus developing in-house in Cambridge Mass or Cambridge UK, that spread is getting thinner by the day, right? So the playbook has to be updated. And I think that makes sense to do so. Uh and what that looks like, I think, you know, from our standpoint, what it means is that capability isn't going away.

Simeon George, M.D. So we have to find ways to create an aligned structure or incentive to work with partners there. And it probably means exploring joint ventures or other ways to essentially do things creatively that take advantage of the capability that the players in that region have and take advantage of our taste, our connectivity, our ability to think about the global development and ultimately commercialization of the molecules.

Ben Comer Yeah, one of the points uh that I found interesting in the report is this idea of um doing discovery work and generating IP in European or US labs, then moving the drug candidate to China for that, you know, faster, cheaper preclinical and early clinical development, the de-risking, right? Uh, and then um are are there, I guess uh so is that kind of what you're foreseeing?

Ben Comer The model kind of shifting to the IP originating in the US and Europe, and then doing some of that that early work uh in in China to take advantage of the speed and costs. Is that what you're seeing start to happen?

Simeon George, M.D. I mean, I don't know if it's shifting from US and Europe to China. I think IP is gonna be generated everywhere, including there's no doubt they have an ambition to move towards, you know, from best in class to first in class over the coming years.

Ben Comer Yeah, the five-year plan you referenced, right?

Simeon George, M.D. Exactly, right? So that's gonna happen. So I think it's again, for me, it's how do you move as quickly and efficiently from your starting point of you know, basic, you know, chemistry or biological substrate to a defining data set that, to your point, de-risks sort of the path forward enough for investors or strategics to say, you know what, we now want to continue to advance into the later stage, more expensive phases of development, right?

Simeon George, M.D. And so I think it's probably a transnational um development framework that we are likely moving towards where there's some element of work that's done, and it can be the origination or it can be the early development that's done cross-border, and that can be China, it can be Australia, it can be UK. You know, implicitly what I'm saying is we are looking for a minimum friction from regulatory agencies globally, where the patients are available and accessible, and how we think we can ultimately move things smoothly from point A to B to C, et cetera.

Ben Comer Yeah. I I mean, I the the policy environment in this space is is ticklish. To to put it one way, um there, you know, there's there's been you know various actions that the the trump, at least and I'm speaking from the US here. Um the Trump administration has has taken a number of actions with regard to to China.

Ben Comer It's shifting like we've been talking about, you know, things are are changing all the time. Um, but I'm curious, you know, if you think that there's a potential risk, a regulatory risk, that the US or or Europe could kind of tighten down or you know, start rejecting or blocking, you know, early stage clinical data from China, for example?

Ben Comer Um or does that matter, you know, as long as like the later stage trials are conducted in in markets where the drugs are going to be commercialized? Like is there, I guess what I'm trying to ask is is there uh a potential uh consequence where companies are are doing maybe phase one, uh maybe early phase two work in China coming over and you know trying to get started on a phase three and the FDA you know questioning the quality of the clinical data coming from China.

Ben Comer Is that a scenario that you think about at all?

Simeon George, M.D. I mean, again, I think for us, we are now again, like I describe it as like a again, transnational or like one global development strategy. I'm trying to think about all the pieces on the on the puzzle board. And how can I start to build my own conviction around a particular drug, the mechanism, the impact, the clinical impact that it's gonna have?

Simeon George, M.D. What are the quickest and most capital efficient ways to do rigorous testing early on to de-risk, right? And so again, I think it it really is situational. In some instances, it's going to make sense probably to stay within the US or Europe or Australia to do that work. In some instances, listen, it it'll make sense to move into China.

Simeon George, M.D. And let's not forget, I'm sure if you're sitting in India or the Middle East, you're looking at what's happening and you're saying, like, we can probably over the next five, 10, 20 years, start to develop some level of capability that should allow us to also build up our ecosystem, right?

Ben Comer Yeah, absolutely.

Simeon George, M.D. Dynamic. Um, but I think China is for sure a global player now. We have to have it as part of our ultimately developing strategy in some way, shape, or form. But ultimately, you want to have a path to the US and European markets from a commercial standpoint. And you have to think in a very um front-on way with how are you going to engage with the regulators in those regions that can give them an ask confidence that the data set that you're bringing to them is reproducible.

Simeon George, M.D. It's been QA, QC'd, it represents patients that are going to be similar to the ones in the local demographics. Um, and again, I think the pricing pressure here is not it's worth reflecting on, right? We all want to bring down the cost of drugs. And so if there's a way to do this that allows transnational, like global development framework, including China, to be part of that, I think from a societal level, like that makes sense.

Simeon George, M.D. And we should be encouraging it as long as there are the appropriate checks and balances along the way.

Ben Comer Um, you referenced the fact that uh that SR One works with uh with Chinese biopharma companies. I wonder if you could describe maybe uh give us an example of that or describe an experience you've had um uh with you know companies that are uh that are set up in China, Chinese biotech companies.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, so I mean to this date, we've now invested in I think eight companies where assets have been sourced from China. The companies that we have invested in are US or European entities. So we have not directly invested in um in China, but we've you know developed close relationships with local partners, done deals with them, sourced assets, and then put them into NUCOs.

Simeon George, M.D. And so, you know, examples are like Xenus or Avenzo or WinWord, uh, most notably, where again, we've taken uh clinical stage assets in certain instances, and then again thought about the global development plan for those products. Um as I said, like that arbitrage around time and cost to be able to get those deals done has probably narrowed since when we did those deals, even two, three years ago.

Simeon George, M.D. And so on a go forward basis, the conversations we're having with local Chinese entities is around, again, more of a um aligned structure, a joint venture, which would allow us to essentially not only do one-off deals around specific assets, but potentially do uh a pipeline of um projects with them, right?

Simeon George, M.D. Where there's ownership and skin in the game for them in the entity that we're putting together. We are providing some level of, again, taste access around where we think pharma is moving. And the local Chinese partners providing the capability, the resources to be able to design the molecules or give us access to the molecules.

Ben Comer Um I I wanted to bring up this idea that I uh heard from uh Syriac Roding on a recent episode of the business of biotech. And it's it's on this issue of China and and the US competing on innovation. And you know, he he brought up some other things I hadn't thought about, which is you know, like drug shortages, for example.

Ben Comer You know, if if if a cancer drug goes into shortage and it's you know made by a Chinese biotech company, um, you know, maybe you're not getting it in Europe or or in the US as just as one consideration. But what I wanted to bring up that he mentioned was just on this broader topic of US and China competition and biotech, he um mentioned the idea of a sovereign wealth fund.

Ben Comer Uh and it's something that I think the Trump administration has either tried to enact through an executive order or has proposed in recent times. I haven't looked at the status of that, but my understanding is that ultimately they couldn't figure out, you know, like how to fund it and how to administer it.

Ben Comer I don't think it's it's gone anywhere. But I was just curious about your thoughts on that, Simeon, like a a US-led sovereign wealth fund for preclinical and early stage biotechs that would focus specifically on the kind of valley of death period where so many companies, you know, with potentially really good science just fail.

Ben Comer Um, do you do you like that idea? Do you think it it's a bad one? You know, what would you say to the sovereign wealth fund idea?

Simeon George, M.D. I mean, this I I like, I think we should be thinking outside the box right now, right? A lot of what we just talked about are new concepts that are taking shape just in the last few years. Um, you know, for me principally, like the problem in the US is not necessarily lack of access to capital. Like there's capital that's available um across every part of the value chain, certainly more than any other place on earth at this point.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, more and more going to China, though. That's true. But at the same time, from my standpoint, you know, what I worry about in the US is, you know, basic research. For example, the NIH, like having cuts there that ultimately will have a medium to long term effect on how we continue to have the most talented scientists that are well funded and aligned with continue to take basic science innovation that ultimately translates into industry innovation, right, and product innovation.

Simeon George, M.D. And so for me, it's in the idea of a Starbucks. Wealth fund necessarily isn't necessarily getting to where I think we need to focus our efforts. I think it's making sure we're funding basic research, making sure that, again, there is a way to cut out friction as you think about the regulatory frameworks and the pathways around which we move efficiently molecules forward.

Simeon George, M.D. So there's clarity of where the end posts are, there's consistency around how we're applying those rules for the molecules and the modalities that we're talking about. There's the right level of talent that is staying engaged in this ecosystem rather than going elsewhere because funding is changing. And so for me, like the sovereign wealth idea, again, it's an interesting idea, but for me, the things that I just described are probably more top of mind at this stage.

Ben Comer Yeah. Yeah. Well, while we're while we're on uh kind of out-of-the-box ideas, I'll I'll I'll mention one one more and get your thoughts on it, uh, Simeon. And that is the implications of of Calci and Polymarket opening up betting on clinical trial results. And I I think it's I'm not sure if it's both, but I think both have made it phase three and later, uh, phase three and and like FDA approval.

Ben Comer Um but uh I'm curious, you know, what you think about that. What are the, you know, what are the implications? What are the potential unintended consequences?

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, I mean, candidly, it's it's not something I think a lot about or spend much time on. I would say it's an interesting sort of barometer, I guess, of where um, you know, think of it as like a polling based on the sample size and sort of the the way people are thinking about aggregating information and and forming a certain view.

Simeon George, M.D. Call it.

Ben Comer Oh, so like the way a company's message is breaking through, maybe like a narrative about a pro uh you know, an asset.

Simeon George, M.D. Yeah, but candidly, I don't think we should confuse that what the belief system or the way that communication is being with scientific facts, with ultimately with clinical evidence and scientific facts, right? So the thing I care about going back to first principles, like ultimately these are patients in clinical trials.

Simeon George, M.D. Like you want to make sure that this does not have an impact in any way, shape, or form on how patients are continuing to enroll and stay in these trials. Like there's some level of leakage I worry about, whether it's at the investigator level, CRO level. Um, and I'm not sure candidly, like there are ways for this to be manipulated.

Simeon George, M.D. Again, you can think about from a trading standpoint, et cetera, that doesn't help ultimately what I care about, which is ultimately moving products to patients and having patient impact. And of course, creating value through the way that we're investing in those companies. And things that take away from that and true north for me is is not worth necessarily spending a lot of time on.

Ben Comer Yeah, well, thank you for fielding that question. I saw that news uh pop up recently and uh and wanted to ask someone about it. So uh thank you. Thank you uh for your thoughts on it, uh Simeon. We're we're coming up um on the end of our time here, but uh maybe we could just end with with your top priorities for the rest of this year and maybe the first half of next year.

Ben Comer You know, what are the issues and and trends uh that you're watching? What are your top priorities?

Simeon George, M.D. I mean, listen, I think we've had a really robust discussion. Like there's so many forces right now that are taking shape. And so my priorities are making sure that I'm thinking through with first principles, how do we take what's happening in China, this immense technological advance with AI? How do I make sure that it is getting um infused into blueprint of how we think about the business model of biotech, at least the SR One lens in 2026 and beyond?

Simeon George, M.D. And so again, a lot of what we've just talked about are discussions we're having internally, we're expressing those ideas through companies that we're starting or we're investing in, uh and we're trying to stay engaged in what is a rapidly, rapidly changing ecosystem. But at the same time, there is the blocking and tackling of the day job, right?

Simeon George, M.D. We're managing a portfolio of 60 companies. You know, I mentioned ARX, you know, as an example. We've had, you know, I think now four IPOs, two MA events, hopefully a number of other important uh events to follow. And most importantly, we have medicines that are sitting with the FDA, including the Arcellix drug, Anidocell, as well as the Minerelis drug for hypertension, which we expect hopefully by the end of this year to have regulatory clarity around.

Simeon George, M.D. And then it's commercializing medicines that are gonna have hopefully massive patient impact, right? Because that's ultimately what we care about. Um, and so those are the things, right? I'm sure next time we speak, there'll be new forces that who are taking shape or are changing this conversation. But that true north stays the same.

Ben Comer Well, I would love to have you back uh in the future to talk about the the new uh issues that uh we don't know what they're gonna be at, Simeon. But thank you so much for taking the time today. I really appreciate it.

Simeon George, M.D. My pleasure. Thank you.

Ben Comer We've been speaking with Dr. Simeon George, CEO and co-founder at SR One Capital Management. I'm Ben Comer, and you've just listened to the Business of Biotech. Find us and subscribe anywhere you listen to podcasts, and be sure to check out our weekly video cast of these conversations every Monday under the Business of Biotech tab at life science leader.com.

Ben Comer We'll see you next week, and thanks as always for listening.

Anmelden oder registrieren

Jetzt

0:00 / 0:00