[24-109] Louisiana v. Callais

Louisiana v. Callais

Justia (supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/2024/24-109) · Docket (supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/publi…) · oyez.org/cases/2024/24-109 · YouTube (youtube.com/watch?v=1ERZDlo5PSs)

Argued on Mar 24, 2025.

Appellant: Louisiana.
Appellee: Phillip Callais, et al.

Advocates: • J. Benjamin Aguinaga (for the Appellant in No. 24-109)

• Stuart C. Naifeh (for the Appellants in No. 24-110)

• Edward D. Greim (for the Appellees)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

This case involves a challenge to Louisiana’s congressional redistricting map, specifically focusing on District 6, alleging that the map is an impermissible racial gerrymander. The map was created in response to a previous lawsuit, Robinson v. Ardoin, where plaintiffs argued that the prior map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority votes. To address these issues, the Louisiana Legislature adopted a new map (Senate Bill 8) that included a second majority-Black district. However, the plaintiffs in this case claimed that this new map violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by prioritizing race in its creation. A three-judge panel concluded that District 6 of the new map did indeed violate the Equal Protection Clause, leading the court to issue an injunction against using this map in future elections.

Question

Does Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black congressional district constitute unconstitutional racial gerrymandering, even when drawn in response to a federal court finding that the state’s prior single majority-Black district likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?