- täglichErscheinungsrhythmus
- 1 h 30typische Länge
- 14. Okt.letzte Folge
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Folgen
Salazar v. Paramount Global
A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer,” refers to all of a video tape service provider’s goods
Beaird v. United States
A case in which the Court will decide whether Stinson v. United States still correctly states the rule for deference that courts must give the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when the federal government submits a permit application to continue disposing of hazardous waste, whether that submission count as a final, reviewable government decision under federal law; and (2)
Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee
A case in which the Court will decide whether a complaint alleging a fiduciary breach in ERISA underperformance cases must include allegations of a “meaningful benchmark” to survive the pleading stage.
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether it has statutory and Article III jurisdiction to hear this case; and (2) whether federal law precludes state-law claims seeking relief for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interst
Johnson v. United States Congress
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act stripped district courts of the jurisdiction, recognized by this court in Johnson v. Robison, to hear challenges to the constitutionality of acts of Congress af
Mullin v. Doe
A case in which the Court held that the TPS statute’s judicial review bar blocks all non-constitutional challenges to the Secretary of Homeland Security's decisions to grant, extend, or terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS).
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
A case in which the Court held that a generic drug manufacturer does not actively induce patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271(b) when its communications consist only of legally required labeling, standard industry language, omissions, a
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I
A case in which the Court held that neither the Alien Tort Statute nor the Torture Victim Protection Act supplies a judicially implied private right of action for aiding-and-abetting liability.
Monsanto Company v. Durnell
A case in which the Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts a label-based failure-to-warn claim where EPA has not required the warning.
Chatrie v. United States
A case in which the Court held that law enforcement’s use of a geofence warrant to obtain location data from a tech company constitutes a Fourth Amendment search, requiring a valid warrant supported by probable cause and particularity, beca
Blanche v. Lau
A case in which the Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not require a border officer to possess clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident has committed a crime involving moral turpitude before
Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.
A case in which the Court held that the Seventh Amendment's right to a jury trial does not require the FCC to involve a jury when issuing forfeiture orders.
T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
A case in which the Court held that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which bars federal district courts from reviewing and nullifying state-court judgments, applies even when the state-court judgment under attack remains subject to an ongoing a
Sripetch v. SEC
A case in which the Court held that the SEC may seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm.
Trump v. Barbara
A case in which the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause guarantees U.S. citizenship at birth to every person born on American soil, including children whose parents are present in the country unlawfully or on tempo
Pitchford v. Cain
A case in which the Court held that when a trial court prevents a defendant from completing the three-step Batson process for challenging racially discriminatory jury strikes, a state appellate court's subsequent finding that the defendant
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal court that initially exercises jurisdiction and stays a case pending arbitration maintains jurisdiction over a post-arbitration Section 9 or 10 application where jurisdiction would oth
Abouammo v. United States
A case in which the Court held that venue is proper only in the district where the alleged offense took place, not in the district where the targeted investigation was located.
Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock
A case in which the Court held that a worker who handles goods on a purely intrastate (within one state) leg of a broader interstate journey qualifies for the Federal Arbitration Act's (FAA) §1 exemption, even if the worker never personally
Noem v. Al Otro Lado
A case in which the Court will decide whether a noncitizen who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border “arrives in the United States” within the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., which provi
Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated
A case in which the Court held that judicial estoppel does not automatically bar a debtor's undisclosed civil claim based solely on a potential motive to conceal it. Instead, courts must look to the totality of the circumstances to distingu
Watson v. Republican National Committee
A case in which the Court held that federal election-day statutes, which set the date on which voters must cast their ballots, do not require ballots to physically arrive at election offices by that date and therefore do not preempt state l
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
A case in which the Court held that 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c) does not preempt state negligent-hiring lawsuits against transportation brokers, because those claims fall within the law's built-in safety exception preserving state authority to reg
Hunter v. United States
A case in which the Court held that when a criminal defendant signs an appeal waiver as part of a plea agreement, that waiver becomes unenforceable if enforcing it would produce a miscarriage of justice.
United States v. Hemani
A case in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance,” violates the Second Amendment as applied to the responde
Pung v. Isabella County
A case in which the Court held that when the government sells a property at a tax foreclosure auction, the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause entitles the former owner only to the surplus proceeds, not the property's hypothetical fair market
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
A case in which the Court held that the thirty-day deadline for moving a lawsuit from state court to federal court is a mandatory rule that judges cannot extend for fairness reasons.
Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
A case in which the Court held that under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, a company that once held any property interest in physical property that Cuba confiscated can sue anyone who later "traffics" in — that
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba)
A case in which the Court held that the Helms-Burton Act strips Cuban government agencies and instrumentalities of their foreign sovereign immunity without requiring plaintiffs to separately satisfy any exception under the Foreign Sovereign
