- täglichErscheinungsrhythmus
- 1 h 30typische Länge
- 14. Okt.letzte Folge
Folgenzu den neuesten
Trump v. Cook
A case in which the Court will decide whether to stay a district court injunction preventing the President from removing a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors “for cause” based on pre-appointment conduct without prior notice or
M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
A case in which the Court held that under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), pension plans may calculate an employer's withdrawal liability using actuarial assumptions selected after the statutory measurement date (the las
Wolford v. Lopez
A case in which the Court held that a Hawaii law that makes it a crime for a licensed concealed carry permit holder to bring a handgun onto private property open to the public—such as a store or restaurant—unless the property owner gives "e
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
A case in which the Court held that the New Jersey Transit Corporation is not an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes.
West Virginia v. B.P.J.
A case in which the Court held that Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause permit states and schools to limit girls’ and women’s sports teams to biological females.
Little v. Hecox
A case in which the Court held that schools may limit women’s and girls’ sports teams to biological females under both Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and states may determine eligibility for female spo
Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
A case in which the Court held that the federal officer removal statute allows a defendant to move a state-court suit to federal court if the challenged conduct has a plausible and close relationship to the performance of federal duties.
FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
A case in which the Court held that Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act (ICA) does not give private individuals the power to sue for rescission when they allege a contract violates the Act; that enforcement power belongs to the Secu
Hamm v. Smith
A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins claim.
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission
A case in which the Court held that limits on coordinated party expenditures in 52 U.S.C. § 30116 violate the First Amendment.
Trump v. Slaughter
A case in which the Court held that the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and overruled Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935).
Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi
A case in which the Court held that its decision in Heck v. Humphrey does not bar claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking only prospective relief when the plaintiff has previously been punished under the challenged law.
First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin
A case in which the Court held that a government subpoena demanding a private organization's donor records inflicts an immediate injury to First Amendment freedom of association rights, allowing the organization to challenge the demand in f
Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment
A case in which the Court held that an internet service provider does not commit "contributory copyright infringement" — meaning legal responsibility for copyright violations committed by someone else — simply by continuing to provide inter
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi
A case in which the Court held that a federal court of appeals must defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ judgment that a given set of undisputed facts does not demonstrate mistreatment severe enough to constitute “persecution” under 8
Fernandez v. United States
A case in which the Court held that a prisoner who wants to challenge the validity of his conviction after sentencing must use the federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. §2255—not the compassionate release statute, 18 U.S.C. §3582
Rutherford v. United States
A case in which the Court held that when Congress makes a sentencing reduction non-retroactive, the gap between an old sentence and what a defendant would receive under the new law cannot qualify as an "extraordinary and compelling reason"
The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal
A case in which the Court will decide whether an order denying a government contractor’s claim of derivative sovereign immunity under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, whic
Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections
A case in which the Court held that an individual may not sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump
A case in which the Court held that the International Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 (“IEEPA”), does not permit the president to impose tariffs.
Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist
A case in which the Court held that a federal court cannot create jurisdiction over a lawsuit through its own erroneous ruling. When an appellate court reverses a district court's mistaken dismissal of a party who destroyed complete diversi
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
A case in which the Court held that a motion to set aside a judgment as void under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) must be filed within a "reasonable time" as required by Rule 60(c)(1).
Rico v. United States
A case in which the Court held that the Sentencing Reform Act does not permit a defendant's term of supervised release to automatically extend when the defendant absconds.
Hencely v. Fluor Corporation
A case in which the Court held that federal law does not block state-law lawsuits against military contractors for actions that the government neither ordered nor authorized.
Louisiana v. Callais
A case in which the Court held that Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black congressional district constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering, even when drawn in response to a federal court finding that the state’s prior sin
Case v. Montana
A case in which the Court held that law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant when they have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or faces imminent serious injury.
Ellingburg v. United States
A case in which the Court held that criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Bowe v. United States
A case in which the Court held that the statutory bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) that prohibits certiorari review of court of appeals decisions on second or successive habeas applications does not apply to federal prisoners, and § 2244(b)
United States Postal Service v. Konan
The Federal Tort Claims Act's postal exception — which bars lawsuits against the government for claims "arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter" — shields the United States from liability
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
A case in which the Court held that a candidate for elected office has standing under Article III of the Constitution to challenge election rules that govern the counting of votes in his election, regardless of whether those rules harm his
